The Confidential

The ACC Sports Blog

Archive for the category “Uncategorized”

Syracuse Assistant B-Ball Coach Fine Being Investigated for Molestation

Longtime Syracuse University Assistant Basketball Coach Bernie Fine has been placed on administrative leave based on an investigation into possible child molestation.  On the heels of a major scandal at Penn State (as well as an issue at The Citadel), this report hits close to home, as Syracuse University is set to join the ACC in the near future.

While the Penn State and Syracuse situations share the common bond of accusations of molestation against a person associated with the program, it should be noted that there are substantial differences between what is known about the situation at Syracuse and the situation at Penn State.  As the New York Times has reported, Syracuse University conducted its own investigation into these allegations in 2005:

In a statement, the university said that “an adult male” came to them in 2005 and the university started its own four-month investigation into the allegations. The statement said that the university’s legal counsel spoke with people who “the complainant said would support his claims” and that “all of those identified by the complainant denied any wrongful conduct” by Fine. The statement also said that Fine “vehemently denied the allegations.”

In other words, Syracuse investigated after the police declined to investigate.  So this is not a matter of Syracuse not informing the police.  By the time it got to Syracuse, it was post-police.  And Syracuse still investigated.  Syracuse was apparently unable to corroborate the information that the alleged victim said would be corroborated.  The alleged victim suggested that certain witnesses be interviewed and those witnesses did not confirm the accusations.

Significantly, in order for this matter to rise to the level of Penn State, it would require an assistant coach to witness an incident and report it to Jim Boeheim, who would have to then pass the matter upstream and lose interest.  This certainly is not alleged to have happened at Syracuse.  And there is no sense that Jim Boeheim or anyone at Syracuse University was ever presented with enough to conclude that the report was credible. Most importantly, the report is not grand jury findings, but the version of events provided by a 39-year old victim, not under oath at the time.  No third party has deemed them credible yet.

And these are just some of the differences.  Under the circumstances, while there might be a rush to judgment to criticize Syracuse, there should be an equally compelling rush to judgment to not criticize Syracuse.

At least at this early juncture.  There is certainly more to come.

In fact, the Confidential certainly does not want to suggest that the alleged victim is not being truthful.  Only the victim and Fine know for sure.  All that can be hoped for is that any investigation that takes place uncovers the truth–whether it is the alleged victim’s allegations or Fine’s denials.  In the wake of the Penn State situation, it is understandable that this might be the environment that would persuade a victim to feel more comfortable coming forward.  Perhaps the alleged victim is hoping for same.  But nobody really knows.  And in the absence of numerous allegations by victims, as in the Sandusky situation, it is harder to rush to judgment for any side.

Nevertheless, the Confidential does take issue with Jim Boeheim opining on this issue.  He should probably let his University leaders do most of the talking here.  He cannot be objective when it comes to his long-time assistant.  And, from a strategic standpoint, does he really want to go “all in” by taking a position.  A more reasoned approach would have been to at least hedge his bets somewhat.  You never really know anyone.  He may be confident that Fine is innocent.  But can he be 100% sure?   According to ESPN, Boeheim responded strongly to the alleged victim’s statement that Boeheim might have seen him:

“He makes the point that he was around and traveling with the team,” Boeheim said. “Not that I know of. I never saw him. He is quoted — (that) I saw him in the room. I have never been in Bernie Fine’s room in my life. That is an outright lie.”

Yep, that’s going “all in.”  He better be right.

Finally, the Confidential was strong in its criticism of Penn State in opinions such as this, this, and this.   The Confidential will be equally critical if facts come out demonstrating that this is closer to the Penn State situation than it seems right now.  Needless to say, this will be newsworthy for quite some time.  A major university, and its various departments, cannot support child molesters.  They also cannot cover-up instances of child molestation.  But the current “facts” just do not come anywhere close to suggesting that anything of that sort has occurred at Syracuse.

What do you think?

NCAA Rules Changes

The NCAA has approved some rather radical changes to its rules.

First, the NCAA has allowed schools the ability to add $2,000 to a scholarship.  This would help prevent student-athletes from having a shortfall between the cost of attending a school and what the school is allowed to pride.

The Confidential believes that this rule is long overdue.  For the most part, student-athletes are not allowed to earn income.  That’s a pretty unfortunate Catch-22… money needed, but no ability to earn money.  While some student-athletes have parents that can make up the gap, many other student-athletes do not.  Moreover, $40/week is hardly going to lead to craziness.  I think this is a great move.  Granted, this will not stop boosters from abusing the system.  But I have to figure that having a little spending money has to have some positive impact on temptation.  We’ll give the NCAA an A.

Also, it is noted that the NCAA hopes that this rule will be adopted on a conference-by-conference basis.  The Mac could vote to make it $500.  The Sun Belt could opt against it.  It is certainly expect that the wealthier conferences will not hesitate to take advantage of this.  This will likely lead to a further gap between the AQ schools and the non-AQ schools.  But conferring this benefit on student-athletes, which will remedy a present unfairness, is worth that risk.

Second, individual schools can choose to award multiyear scholarships, which may not be revoked based on performance.  The Confidential is less sure about this one.  For one, who decides what “revoked based on performance” means?  If a kid with an attitude problem does not perform well, he could rather easily be dismissed from the team for “improper conduct.”  That same conduct with a star could be ignored.  I tend to think this will lead to litigation.

That being said, the absence of multiyear scholarships is absurd.  A student-athlete is punished for transferring.  However, a university can revoke a scholarship at will.  And that usually occurs to allow a better player to have the scholarship.  That is patently unfair.  It sends the wrong message.  Also, I think this rule will also work against the AQ schools in recruiting.  If a Houston can offer a student a 4-year scholarship, but Texas Tech will only offer a 1-year scholarship, this may offset any differences regarding stipends.  This is a benefit to the true student-athletes.  All in all, it is hard to quibble with the rule change.  We’ll give the NCAA a B+.

Third, there will now be a rule that schools that fail to meet the Academic Progress Rate benchmark will be ineligible for playoffs, tournaments, and bowl games.  The devil is in the details.  The 4-year phase in is helpful.   There is going to be some pain here.  The Confidential needs to see how this gets implemented before giving it anything more than a C.  The fear is that this will punish schools whose players leave through no fault of the school.  On the other hand, it does emphasize recruiting players who are going to at least do the minimum as students.

Fourth, incoming freshmen will now need a 2.3 GPA, rather than 2.0 GPA.   The Confidential gives this a D.   The difference between 2.3 and 2.0 is meaningless.  Grades vary.  Integrity in grading varies.  The Confidential would rather see the schools create programs to bring the student-athletes with subpar academics UP to par, rather than just exclude them.

Finally, there were some rule changes regarding basketball recruiting activity periods and types of contact.  Again, while attempting to correct problems with recruiting, it remains to be seen whether this will just lead to new problems.  This deserves an incomplete.

In sum, The Confidential gives the NCAA rules an aggregate grade point average of 2.58.   Not exactly demonstrating a good example…

Welcome!

Welcome to the Atlantic Coast Confidential–a conference about the Atlantic Coast Conference. 

Do not let the name discourage you, we’ll let you read these tidbits about basketball, football, lacrosse, and anything else that is of interest to fans of the various schools in the ACC.

And that includes the newbies, Syracuse and Pittsburgh!  We are not sure when they will join, but they are part of the ACC now, so they deserve the coverage.

So whether you color yourself a Blue Devil, an Orange, or a Yellow Jacket … whether you are an Eagle, a Hokie, a Terrapin, Tiger, a Panther, or part of the Wolfpack… whether you are a Cavalier, a Demon Deacon, a Seminole, or a Tarheel… and whether you are a Hurricane… stay tuned.

This is THE source you need.

Post Navigation