The Confidential

The ACC Sports Blog

Archive for the month “January, 2013”

Big Weekend for ACC Hoops Today

This weekend promises to be an exciting one for ACC basketball fans.

Saturday, January 19, 2013:

The big game will be #1 Louisville v #6 Syracuse.  Syracuse will be playing without its top offensive threat, James Southerland.  Louisville is on quite a roll.  Can Louisville hang on to #1?

North Carolina has not been North Carolina this year.  Maryland is 14-3.  Can Maryland go into the Dean Dome and topple the Tar Heels?

Florida State and Virginia were two of the most surprising teams in basketball last year.  Both have somewhat disappointing records so far.  They play today–some has to win and get momentum.

In other games, Wake Forest and Virginia Tech square off.  14-4 Pitt hosts UConn.  And #20 Notre Dame hosts Rutgers.

Sunday, January 20, 2013:

Sunday’s lone game features North Carolina State, now ranked #14, hosting Clemson.  These are the games that the Wolfpack need to win going away to show that they are worthy of a top 4 seed in March.

 

New Atlantic Coast Confidential Member Added

Good afternoon ladies & gents!

My name is Jeff and I’ll be contributing to the Atlantic Coast Confidential website on a weekly basis moving forward.  I wanted to give you a brief introduction before I get started.  First of all I’m a huge sports fanatic & a big stat guy.  I prefer college over professional sports, but I like it all, especially the ACC.  I’m a South Carolinian and partial to the Clemson Tigers, however I find a way to pull for one team in nearly every match-up.  Some of my earliest childhood memories involve attending Clemson football games with my family, particularly my grandfather and cousin.  After years of dedication, I now bleed Clemson orange.  In my spare time I like to hit the gym, play golf, do anything involving good friends or the outdoors, all while giving you a new sports article to read each week.  I look forward to reading your comments and receiving your feedback in the near future.

Thanks,
Jeff

Don’t Think Expansion is Over Just Yet…

Look… this is just never going to end.  With the Big East dying a slow death, and with Maryland’s departure, it is clear that the ACC is everyone’s target for future expansion.  And now the Big XII commissioner, Bob Bowlsby, is going on record that it may not be d0ne expanding.  So, if you are an ACC fan, this is not the time to get over-confident.

To be sure, it may be that the Big XII will decide not to expand.  They have plenty of money per school and the good fortune of a true round-robin in conference play.  The only real drawback to 10 members is the absence of a conference title game.  And Bowlsby does have a problem with the NCAA stating that 12, rather than 10, is the magic number for a lucrative championship game.  And, frankly, he has a point.  Who really cares–if the Big XII wants to have a conference championship game, the NCAA might as well let them.  A pretty victim-less “crime.”

Returning to expansion, the usual names will always pop up–Florida State, Clemson, Virginia Tech, Miami, etc.  It is hard to see other schools adding to the per-school payouts that the Big XII will be generating.  And it is even harder to see a Duke, North Carolina, or Virginia being amenable to the academic inferiority that the Big XII would bring.  Still, the ACC has to be a little nervous.

More positive from an ACC standpoint is this blurb from Bowlsby:

“That’s exactly one of the questions we’ll be asking ourselves,” Bowlsby said Wednesday. “Look at Maryland and Rutgers. They don’t bring programs that are of the ilk of the others in the Big Ten. The philosophy clearly is: ‘As members of the Big Ten we can grow them.’ “

Maybe the Big XII is wondering whether it can grow a program or two of its own.  If so, enter Cincinnati, BYU, and perhaps even UConn.  These have to be the best three overall schools that are not affiliated with the top 5 conferences.  And perhaps nobody should be sleeping on South Florida.  The Big XII could add some viewership with the Cincinnati and Tampa markets.  At the very least, it is possible for the Big XII to expand without trying to lure an ACC school.

In the meantime, all anyone can do is sit back and watch.  Unless, of course, the ACC wants to start discussing a Grant of Rights… but that is another topic for another day.

ACC Beats SEC in One Metric: Revenue?

UPDATE:  Here is a link to the actual Forbes article, which provides more detail.  The Big XII comes in 5th at $262,000,000. Wondering about the Big East?  Try $94,000,000.

According to Forbes, the ACC has more revenue than the SEC.  The article ACC beat out the SEC in terms of revenue by several percent, allowing the ACC to snag the #3 spot in the conference rankings.  The Big 10 was #1, with the Pac 12 finishing second.

That being said, file this article under “FWIW,” with the “worth” being “not so much.”  After all, the Big XII seemed to be omitted.

It is also difficult to understand how the Big 10’s revenue of $310,000,000, could be only slightly more than the ACC’s revenue of $293,000,000.  While the article mentions “estimates,” it is unclear what possible estimate could lead to this calculation.  The Pac-12 was listed as having $303,000,000 in revenue, while the SEC trailed all conferences at $270,000,000.  Of course, the SEC is due to renegotiate its television deal soon, which will result in an increase.

What do you think?  Are these numbers legit?

ACC Basketball Rankings: January 15, 2013

This is particularly complex with Pitt, Louisville, Notre Dame, and Syracuse not yet in the ACC, but it can still be done.  This is how the Confidential ranks the ACC basketball teams as of January 8, 2013:

1Duke (15-1)–The Blue Devils lost.  But they have beaten Louisville–so how can the Cardinals slide up to #1.  Yet.

2. Louisville (16-1)–The ACC’s newest addition is now #1 in the country.  They beat UConn on Monday and get Syracuse this weekend.

3.Syracuse (16-1)–The Orange have another academic casualty–James Southerland.  They still did pretty well without Fab Melo last year though.

4.North Carolina State (14-2)–The Wolfpack did what nobody else could do this year–beat Duke.  Still, with two losses, hard to move them into the top 3.

5. Notre Dame (14-2)--The Irish were on a roll, but then they ran into UConn.  The Irish will hold onto a top 5 spot for now.

6. Miami (12-3)–Miami has nice wins over Michigan State, North Carolina, and Maryland.  3-0 in the ACC is a great start.

7. Maryland (13-3)–The Terps do not have many good wins.  The losses to Miami and Florida State do not help the resume either.

8. Pittsburgh (13-4)–The Panthers were looking good at 12-1 with its only loss being to Michigan.  They have now lost 3 of 4 Big East games.  The win over Georgetown is nice though.

9. Virginia (11-5)–The Wahoos do not have a more impressive resume than North Carolina.  But they did beat North Carolina, whose resume is not that great either.

10. North Carolina (11-5)–North Carolina is not looking great this year at all.  It is going to be a battle to make the Big Dance.

11. Florida State (10-6)The Seminoles are looking decent at 10-6, at least compared to how the season started.  A win over UNC would have been nicer though.

12. Wake Forest (9-6)–The Demon Deacons were #16 a week ago.  But now they are 2-1 in conference, with the only loss being to Duke.  12-16 is a crapshoot anyway.

13. Clemson (9-6)–The Tigers have the best win among the bottom 4–Virginia.  Better than nothing.

14. Boston College (9-7)–The Eagles have a win over Virginia Tech.  So that gets them the #14 spot this week.

15. Virginia Tech (10-6)–After starting 7-0, the Hokies have lost 6 of 9.  They even lost to Boston College.

16. Georgia Tech (10-5)–The Yellow Jackets are 0-3 in conference play, so that means the cellar.

Right/wrong?  Disagree?  If not, let us know.

ACC Considering a Network?

In a move that should surprise exactly nobody, the Atlantic Coast Conference may be considering an ACC network.  The Big 10 has one that mints money.  The Pac-12 is working on a network.  The SEC is in the planning stages of having a network.  The ACC really has to consider this as a means of survival.  Or at least “keeping up with the Joneses.”

While nobody should expect an ACC network to generate the type of revenue that the Big 10 network does, the ACC can still make additional money with a network.  The Big 10 has been successful with third-tier games.  An expanded ACC has some pretty compelling third-tier games to offer.  And the ACC basketball side of things will lead to substantial inventory.  This is what the Big East always missed–basketball is inventory.  Hopefully, the ACC will learn from the Big East’s mistake.  You’ve got to market what you have to market.

To be sure, ESPN has the ACC’s rights locked up for the next 15 years.  But if ESPN wants to have an ACC, it is going to have to bend.  If the ACC is splintered and split up by the other conferences, Fox could very well end up with some of the most attractive names.  ESPN may have sole rights over the SEC, but the SEC only has room for 2 more teams.  The Big 10 and Big 12 can take 8-10 teams between them.

In any event, it is good to see the ACC exploring all of its options.  A network is part of the future revenue puzzle.

The Confidential’s College Football Top 25 & Bottom 4: Final

Each week, the Confidential will provide its ranking of the top 25 teams in College Football, as well as the Bottom 4 BCS-level teams.  Here is the Final version, with analysis of the top 10 and bottom 4:

  1. Alabama (13-1): The SEC proves again that it can take care of business on the national stage.  But Alabama deserves special credit for turning into a dynasty. Wow.
  2. Notre Dame (12-1): The Fighting Irish played a tough schedule and came out 12-0.  Sure, they lost to Alabama.  That just makes them #2.
  3. Ohio State (12-0):  The Buckeyes were idle during bowl season, due to an improvident decision by its athletic director to not sit out last year’s bowl.  Urban Meyer has things going in Columbus though.
  4. Oregon (12-1): A great January for Oregon.  They beat Kansas State by a decent margin and, most importantly, kept Chip Kelly.
  5. Georgia (12-2): Georgia’s only losses were to South Carolina and Alabama.  Hard to argue with that.
  6. South Carolina (11-2): South Carolina lost two games all season–to LSU and Florida.  Gives them the edge over Texas A&M.
  7. Texas A&M (11-2): The Aggies showed that they belonged in the SEC.  The only losses were to LSU and Florida.
  8. Stanford (12-2): The Cardinal have that inexplicable loss to Washington and a loss to Notre Dame.  Otherwise, Stanford beat Oregon, Oregon State, UCLA (twice), Wisconsin, and USC.  That’s all.
  9. Florida (11-2):  The Gators were dismantled by Louisville, but had a very good season overall.  Hard to have Florida State leapfrog them when Florida won the head-to-head game.
  10. Florida State (12-2): Florida State had a great season.  That loss to North Carolina State remains hard to justify though.
  11. Louisville (11-2).
  12. LSU (10-3).
  13. Clemson (11-2).
  14. Kansas State (11-2).
  15. Oklahoma (10-3).
  16. Northwestern (10-3).
  17. Boise State (11-2).
  18. Utah State (11-2).
  19. Northern Illinois (12-2).
  20. Cincinnati (10-3).
  21. Nebraska (10-4).
  22. Kent State (11-3).
  23. Vanderbilt (9-4).
  24. Oregon State (9-4).
  25. Penn State (8-4).

* * *

121.  Illinois (2-10).  The Illini were overmatched in the Big 10 this year.  2013 should be better though.

122. Kentucky (2-10).  Kentucky beat Samford and Kent State.  That Kent State win looks pretty good now!

123. Kansas (1-11).  Kansas was the only Big XII team to not make a bowl.  Going to be a tough rebuilding process.

124. Colorado (1-11).  The Buffaloes actually kept it close against Utah to finish the season.  But there was too little of that in 2012.

So there it is.  If you do not like it… sorry.  But feel free to share your reasons why…

ACC Releases College Football Schedule for 2013.

The Atlantic Coast Conference, set to expand to 14 teams for 2013, has released the football schedule for this fall.

First, the divisions.  The ACC insists on eschewing the geographical split, instead opting for this setup:

Atlantic Division Coastal Division
Boston College Virginia Tech
Clemson Georgia Tech
Florida State Miami
Maryland Virginia
NC State North Carolina
Syracuse Pitt
Wake Forest Duke

Obviously, each team plays every team within its division.  Then, in order to get to 8 total games, each team has a primary crossover and a rotating crossover.  The team’s primary crossovers are listed in the above chart, with Boston College being paired with Virginia Tech, etc.  Syracuse and Pitt will be primary crossovers.

The secondary, rotating  crossovers are not as straightforward.  For 2013, the secondary crossover pairs are: Boston College-North Carolina; Clemson-Virginia; Florida State-Pittsburgh; Maryland-Virginia Tech; NC State-Duke; Syracuse-Georgia Tech; and Wake Forest-Miami.

Pittsburgh begins ACC conference play with home games against Miami, North Carolina, Virginia, and Florida State.  It will travel to Syracuse, Georgia Tech, Duke, and Virginia Tech.  Syracuse begins conference play by hosting Boston College, Wake Forest, Clemson, and Pitt.  Syracuse will travel to Florida State, Georgia Tech, Maryland, and North Carolina State.

In notable games, Florida State will travel to Clemson in 2013.  Florida State will host Miami.  Miami will travel to North Carolina.  North Carolina will travel to Georgia Tech.  Georgia Tech will travel to Clemson.  With the ability to host both Florida State and Georgia Tech, Clemson has to be considered the early favorite.  The return of Tajh Boyd helps that too.

The Confidential does not know about you… but football cannot come around again soon enough!!!

 

Football Safety and Expansion

For many years, Americans have been told that eventually “soccer,” or football as the rest of the world knows it, will take take over as the most popular sport here.  To date, nothing has prevented football (American), baseball, and basketball from being the dominant sports in the United States.  Even auto racing, hockey, tennis, and golf enjoy spectator sport status that seems unlikely to be rivaled by what we call soccer.  However, there was once a time when boxing was high on the list.  Although boxing’s decline might have been caused by sheer mismanagement, the barbaric nature of boxing may have expedited its fall from grace.  The question is this–on the news of yet another brain being damaged by playing football, is there a risk of football declining in popularity over the long term?  The follow-up question is–why engage in all of this realignment for football purposes if football’s future has serious question marks?

The most recent news is that Junior Seau’s brain examination confirm what many expected–he suffered from the chronic brain damage that has afflicted many former NFL players.  Specifically, Seau was determined to have “chronic traumatic encephalopathy, a neurodegenerative disease that can lead to dementia, memory loss and depression.”  The very popular Seau committed suicide in May 2012.  Amazingly, according to ESPN, Seau was never listed as having a concussion.  Nevertheless, it is obvious that Seau had numerous head collisions during his career.  There is no reasonable dispute as to where the brain damage came from–it was football.

One wonders whether football can be made safe.  While helmet technology can advance, there is nothing stopping the players from growing larger, stronger, and faster.  The collisions are only going to get more violent.  One can only hope that there is a way to use technology to prevent these collisions from devastating the lives of the players–both in the short-term and long-term.

To be sure, the NFL appears serious about addressing player safety.  It is a double-edged sword.  The players seem to question the sincerity of the NFL, as fines for violent hits seem more based on public relations than actually protecting the players.  The addition of a weekly Thursday game seems to support the players’ position that the NFL is more interested in money than safety.  At the other extreme, as the violent nature of football is curbed, a segment of the population (including the players) are going to resent the changes.  So making the sport safer for the players may not necessarily lead to an equally popular product.  Needless to say, football has a problem.  As others have noted, there is no inherent reason why football must be popular.

But as this data continues to stream out, at some point parents are going to question whether they can responsibly allow a child to play football.  We are already seeing that shift to soccer.  In more affluent communities, lacrosse is surging in popularity.  Perhaps the popularity of football has peaked.  If football begins being perceived as a barbaric sport akin to boxing, it’s decline will be inevitable.  Can football can avoid the appearance of being a modern-day sport of gladiators?  We enjoy the bone-crushing hits, but we also enjoy it more when the recipient gets back up and walks to the huddle.  That is a level of toughness that inspires awe.  We don’t want our heroes, or even opponents, being seriously hurt.  This is not Rome.

Moreover, unlike boxing, football requires a significant amount of equipment for each player.  At some point, it may no longer be economical for schools to offer football.  Or, stated otherwise, there may be eroding support for incurring the expense of football equipment.  Football cannot sustain its level of popularity if fewer and fewer people are participating at the scholastic level.

In the college landscape, football is the cash cow.  That cash cow depends on continued popularity.  The football money is the reason why there has been realignment discussion daily for the past several years.  It is also the reason why the Big East–with lagging football prowess–runs the risk of extinction.  While basketball can pay for itself, football is so popular and profitable that it pays for all other sports.  In fact, the revenue has gotten so enormous that it is justifying colleges shifting their allegiance from one region to another.

But what if football ceases to be as popular as it is now?  Will all of this realignment have been for naught?  Perhaps this is the reason that schools like Florida State are not so eager to run off to the Big XII.  While football money is nice, a college exists to provide an education.  Abandoning regional comraderie for a few extra football dollars may be shortsighted, especially if football’s popularity is peaking.  At the very least, the aftermath will be a lot of strange bedfellows.  One can only wonder what happens if and when the “buzz” of football money gives way to the hangover of football retreating in popularity.  Those profiting from college football should be keeping a sharp eye on the health of the players.  If the perception of football changes, the profitability of football will not be far behind.

Baseball Writers: Clueless

Apparently, the Baseball Writers Association of America stood up for all that is decent and well in this Country by deeming nobody worthy of entrance into the Baseball Hall of Fame.  Apparently, they were not watching baseball for the past 20 years.  It is unclear how anyone could conclude that Barry Bonds, Roger Clemens, Sammy Sosa, Craig Biggio, Mike Piazza, and Curt Schilling, were not worthy of entrance into the Hall of Fame.  These individuals did more than enough for baseball to justify enshrinement.  We all saw it.  But not the writers.  They want their Hall of Fame clean.  No, they want OUR Hall of Fame clean to THEIR standards.

To be sure, nobody is naive enough to not notice the smell around Bonds, Clemens, and Sosa.  Of course, Clemens was not found guilty of doing anything.  The Confidential does not particularly care for Clemens, but what else could he have done?  And Bonds has never been found guilty of anything either.  Federal funds were expended to bring these players down.  And yet those efforts failed.

More importantly, we saw these guys on the field.  Skinny Barry Bonds was worthy of a Hall of Fame ballot long before the steroid era.  Clemens may well have been too.  Sure, if both of these guys took steroids, and it is hard to debate that they did not, they unfairly extended their careers.  But, at the same time, both guys were doing what they could to help their team too.  Frankly, if steroids was as rampant as claimed, taking steroids was necessary to remain competitive.  That’s not the fault of Bonds and Clemens.  That’s baseball’s fault for allowing so many lesser talents to improve their careers with performance enhancing drugs.  Bonds and Clemens just looked around and decided to join the culture.

But even if they were evil people, taking steroids for evil reasons, why keep them out of the Hall of Fame?  Fame can be positive and negative.  Bonds and Clemens have amazing statistical histories, but will always be dogged by the steroid issue.  Forcing that to take place outside the Hall of Fame, rather than inside, benefits nobody.  These guys should not be ignored, they should be given an asterisk.  And then we can all debate whether that asterisk means anything.

And what about Biggio, Schilling, and Piazza.  Biggio is everything that a Hall of Famer should be.  No accusations of steroids (if that is so important).  Longevity.  Played the game the right way.  Piazza was less rumor-free, but he was as good an offensive catcher as their ever was.  And Schilling’s exploits against the Yankees in the World Series, regardless of how genuine, deserve to be memorialized for all baseball fans.  Tell the story of how generations of Red Sox fans did not see a World Series win, at least until a gimpy Schilling put them on his back and carried them to the prize.

In 2013, none of these guys will enter the Hall of Fame.  That is a shame.  Credit the clueless Baseball Writers Association of America.

Post Navigation