The Confidential

The ACC Sports Blog

Archive for the tag “realignment”

The Rare Shout-Out to Other Blogs

The Confidential’s two favorite general blogs on the Internet, other than this one, are Frank the Tank and ACC Football Rx.  They should be part of any ACC fan’s regular reading.

ACC Football Rx is ACC-focused, which is great.  With a focus on football and expansion, the primary author, Hokie Mark, does a great job of picking subjects, accumulating data, and being realistic/positive about the ACC.  Really, there are far too many good articles over there to point out just one.  Add it your list.

Frank the Tank is expansion-based and Big 10 centric (to say the least), but there are a fair share of commentators who hold an allegiance outside the Big 10.  And the author is quite-evenhanded in discussing other conferences.  The commentariat is a little less reasoned, but are a great source for expansion ideas.

That blog’s latest entry discusses the Big XII and the ACC, the alliance discussed here last week, and other topics.  As always, the blog is quick to note that the assumption that the ACC in jeopardy is more fantasy than reality right now:

So, that’s where I see the threats of the ACC becoming completely coming apart end up failing.  UNC, in particular, has Texas-esque influence (even if it’s more perceived than real) in the ACC, and the actions of Deloss Dodds and the Longhorns have shown that power and big dog status can be even more important as making the most TV money from a conference.  (Notre Dame feels the same way.)  As a result, the thought that UNC and UVA are going to bolt because they are scared that the ACC will collapse doesn’t hold water with me.  Those 2 schools can keep the ACC together alone and they have enough powerful alums with massive pocketbooks and politicians backing them where getting more TV revenue isn’t going to carry the same weight with them as it did with Maryland.

That’s some good stuff too. And it really underscores why the ACC’s biggest problem is worrying about what the rest of the conference schools might be thinking.

If you care about the ACC, expansion matters.  These two blogs are two more to add to your required reading list.

What’s up?/ACC Winter Meetings

Hey guys, what’s up? I just wanted to introduce myself. I’m the new UNC correspondent for Atlantic Coast Confidential. Born in Raleigh, NC to two Virginia Tech grads, I was raised on Tobacco Road and loved every minute of it. Growing up, I actually had pretty much no loyalty to any team at all, cheering for UNC, NC State, Duke (I regret that) and even Wake since VT wasn’t in the ACC yet. But by the time they joined in 2004, I had decided to go to UNC and my loyalties were set for life. I still cheer for VT when they’re not playing Carolina, but when they do, it’s all Carolina all the time. That means that this Saturday’s upcoming game will be pretty fun. But I’m realistic. I know that a stronger ACC makes us all look good, so come tournament time I’m cheering for everybody except Duke (the Lehigh game was great). So while I love Carolina, I’ve always loved the ACC first and am extremely excited about sharing that passion with you.

Mr. Tar Heel

– Watch the ACC Spring Meetings over the next few days. What happens will pretty much determine whether we even need this blog next year, or if the long-rumored (by WVU fans) Armageddon is about to begin. My take- The whole idea is completely overblown. There’s way too much potential in a conference with the best media markets, over 33% of the US population, huge football brands (FSU, ND, Miami, Clemson, VT, etc.), legendary basketball programs (UNC, Duke, NC State, Syracuse, Pitt, Louisville etc.), the best academics, most successful Olympic sports and unparalleled tradition for anything drastic to happen. Swofford will, as he always has, surprise everyone with something that will put the ACC on even monetary terms with the rest of the power conferences. ESPN has invested in the ACC way too much to see its product fall to Fox, or its other competitors. Plus, I just don’t see UNC forsaking its cultural roots for an all-around bad fit (Big 10), or FSU pulling a WVU and letting geographic sense fly out the window.

Friends with Benefits–the ACC and the Big XII?

The Confidential did not make this phrase up.

We can prove it.  Big XII Commissioner Bob Bowlsby recently said this:

“If anything, it’s the opposite,” Bowlsby said. “You can begin to get some advantages without taking on any of the disadvantages (of expansion). It’s one option that allows benefits. It’s kind of like friends with benefits.”

What was Bowlsby talking about?  Apparently, the Big XII is considering an alliance with 3 other conferences that would take expansion/realignment off the table, but allow conferences to use each other to maximize revenue.  The ACC is one of the conferences that the Big XII approached.  This issue involves scheduling, marketing, and perhaps even television contracts.

Look, while some folks are never going to think the ACC is at risk, the defection of Maryland is happening.  Of course, schools have left the ACC before.  Schools even left the SEC once upon a time.  But the money that the Big Ten is generating is simply too much for some institutions to turn their backs on.  So anything that can arguably add revenue to the ACC coffers is important.  If an alliance with the Big XII is part of it, so be it.

From a realignment standpoint, the idea of Florida State and others defecting to the Big XII is debatable.  It seems unlikely that the Seminoles would trade down academically, just to add a few million dollars.  But as long as that is on the table, there is just one more reason for ACC fans to be nervous.  At the same time, the Big XII has to worry about the Pac-12, which has few options for new members geographically.  So an alliance between the three conferences makes some sense.  If the Big XII is only considering adding teams to save itself from a future Pac-12 expansion, the fear of realignment is doing more harm than actual realignment.  As noted above, Bowlsby thinks that an alliance will reduce the pressure for expansion.

Really, the best case scenario would be an 8-10 year agreement between the 5 major conferences to let things play out for a while without more realignment.  The SEC and B1G can make more money by destroying other conferences, but nobody knows the cost of abandoning so many rivalries in the process.  Of course, it is hard to tell the predator to ignore the prey.

 

Conference Realignment–Always Murky

On Friday, the Confidential discussed the different ways to decipher the words trickling out of Big XII headquarters regarding expansion.  Unfortunately, we get to play the game again.  ESPN interviewed the new athletic director from Georgia Tech, Mike Bobinski.  His comments regarding realignment were encouraging or discouraging, depending on how you read them.

First, let’s start with the money quote:

Bobinski smiled when asked if Georgia Tech might be joining the realignment frenzy.

“That’s the ultimate loaded question,” he said, before quickly stressing he thinks the ACC is an “unbelievable home for Georgia Tech. It’s the right fit in today’s world for us.”

The Yellow Jackets’ goals — both athletically and academically — are aligned with conference rivals such as North Carolina, Duke and Virginia, he added.

“That’s the company Georgia Tech belongs in,” Bobinski said. “It’s the right alignment in a lot of ways. I don’t have any inclination at this point in time that there’s any different home in our future. Our goal right now — us and the rest of the members of the ACC — is be as good as we can be in football and strengthen the revenue base in and around the conference, so there’s no temptation for folks to start to be picked off. We’re all-in for the ACC.”

ESPN chooses to see these comments as a positive, treating the comments as a “commitment to the ACC.”  One can kind of see the point there.

But not the folks over at Frank the Tank’s expansion-heavy blog.  The commentariat over there reads heavily between the lines–in a way that is not at all encouraging for ACC fans.  Indeed, why not just say–“NO, as my predecessor noted, Georgia Tech is not going anywhere!”  Also, the latest fetish among the commentariat is an 18-team Big 10 with 4 more ACC teams added to the mix.  So, the comment regarding UNC, Duke, and UVa is perceived as stating Georgia Tech’s preference for brethren if it joins the Big 10.  The Confidential further notes that Mr. Bobiniski has a lot of conditional language in his statements too.  So, as usual, the Frank the Tank folks have a good point too.

But before ordering the ACC tombstone, there is one final positive thought.  At least Mr. Bobinski concluded with a statement that Georgia Tech is “all-in for the ACC.”  If all the schools really could go “all-in” for the ACC, the future would be bright…

Don’t Think Expansion is Over Just Yet…

Look… this is just never going to end.  With the Big East dying a slow death, and with Maryland’s departure, it is clear that the ACC is everyone’s target for future expansion.  And now the Big XII commissioner, Bob Bowlsby, is going on record that it may not be d0ne expanding.  So, if you are an ACC fan, this is not the time to get over-confident.

To be sure, it may be that the Big XII will decide not to expand.  They have plenty of money per school and the good fortune of a true round-robin in conference play.  The only real drawback to 10 members is the absence of a conference title game.  And Bowlsby does have a problem with the NCAA stating that 12, rather than 10, is the magic number for a lucrative championship game.  And, frankly, he has a point.  Who really cares–if the Big XII wants to have a conference championship game, the NCAA might as well let them.  A pretty victim-less “crime.”

Returning to expansion, the usual names will always pop up–Florida State, Clemson, Virginia Tech, Miami, etc.  It is hard to see other schools adding to the per-school payouts that the Big XII will be generating.  And it is even harder to see a Duke, North Carolina, or Virginia being amenable to the academic inferiority that the Big XII would bring.  Still, the ACC has to be a little nervous.

More positive from an ACC standpoint is this blurb from Bowlsby:

“That’s exactly one of the questions we’ll be asking ourselves,” Bowlsby said Wednesday. “Look at Maryland and Rutgers. They don’t bring programs that are of the ilk of the others in the Big Ten. The philosophy clearly is: ‘As members of the Big Ten we can grow them.’ “

Maybe the Big XII is wondering whether it can grow a program or two of its own.  If so, enter Cincinnati, BYU, and perhaps even UConn.  These have to be the best three overall schools that are not affiliated with the top 5 conferences.  And perhaps nobody should be sleeping on South Florida.  The Big XII could add some viewership with the Cincinnati and Tampa markets.  At the very least, it is possible for the Big XII to expand without trying to lure an ACC school.

In the meantime, all anyone can do is sit back and watch.  Unless, of course, the ACC wants to start discussing a Grant of Rights… but that is another topic for another day.

ACC Considering a Network?

In a move that should surprise exactly nobody, the Atlantic Coast Conference may be considering an ACC network.  The Big 10 has one that mints money.  The Pac-12 is working on a network.  The SEC is in the planning stages of having a network.  The ACC really has to consider this as a means of survival.  Or at least “keeping up with the Joneses.”

While nobody should expect an ACC network to generate the type of revenue that the Big 10 network does, the ACC can still make additional money with a network.  The Big 10 has been successful with third-tier games.  An expanded ACC has some pretty compelling third-tier games to offer.  And the ACC basketball side of things will lead to substantial inventory.  This is what the Big East always missed–basketball is inventory.  Hopefully, the ACC will learn from the Big East’s mistake.  You’ve got to market what you have to market.

To be sure, ESPN has the ACC’s rights locked up for the next 15 years.  But if ESPN wants to have an ACC, it is going to have to bend.  If the ACC is splintered and split up by the other conferences, Fox could very well end up with some of the most attractive names.  ESPN may have sole rights over the SEC, but the SEC only has room for 2 more teams.  The Big 10 and Big 12 can take 8-10 teams between them.

In any event, it is good to see the ACC exploring all of its options.  A network is part of the future revenue puzzle.

Football Safety and Expansion

For many years, Americans have been told that eventually “soccer,” or football as the rest of the world knows it, will take take over as the most popular sport here.  To date, nothing has prevented football (American), baseball, and basketball from being the dominant sports in the United States.  Even auto racing, hockey, tennis, and golf enjoy spectator sport status that seems unlikely to be rivaled by what we call soccer.  However, there was once a time when boxing was high on the list.  Although boxing’s decline might have been caused by sheer mismanagement, the barbaric nature of boxing may have expedited its fall from grace.  The question is this–on the news of yet another brain being damaged by playing football, is there a risk of football declining in popularity over the long term?  The follow-up question is–why engage in all of this realignment for football purposes if football’s future has serious question marks?

The most recent news is that Junior Seau’s brain examination confirm what many expected–he suffered from the chronic brain damage that has afflicted many former NFL players.  Specifically, Seau was determined to have “chronic traumatic encephalopathy, a neurodegenerative disease that can lead to dementia, memory loss and depression.”  The very popular Seau committed suicide in May 2012.  Amazingly, according to ESPN, Seau was never listed as having a concussion.  Nevertheless, it is obvious that Seau had numerous head collisions during his career.  There is no reasonable dispute as to where the brain damage came from–it was football.

One wonders whether football can be made safe.  While helmet technology can advance, there is nothing stopping the players from growing larger, stronger, and faster.  The collisions are only going to get more violent.  One can only hope that there is a way to use technology to prevent these collisions from devastating the lives of the players–both in the short-term and long-term.

To be sure, the NFL appears serious about addressing player safety.  It is a double-edged sword.  The players seem to question the sincerity of the NFL, as fines for violent hits seem more based on public relations than actually protecting the players.  The addition of a weekly Thursday game seems to support the players’ position that the NFL is more interested in money than safety.  At the other extreme, as the violent nature of football is curbed, a segment of the population (including the players) are going to resent the changes.  So making the sport safer for the players may not necessarily lead to an equally popular product.  Needless to say, football has a problem.  As others have noted, there is no inherent reason why football must be popular.

But as this data continues to stream out, at some point parents are going to question whether they can responsibly allow a child to play football.  We are already seeing that shift to soccer.  In more affluent communities, lacrosse is surging in popularity.  Perhaps the popularity of football has peaked.  If football begins being perceived as a barbaric sport akin to boxing, it’s decline will be inevitable.  Can football can avoid the appearance of being a modern-day sport of gladiators?  We enjoy the bone-crushing hits, but we also enjoy it more when the recipient gets back up and walks to the huddle.  That is a level of toughness that inspires awe.  We don’t want our heroes, or even opponents, being seriously hurt.  This is not Rome.

Moreover, unlike boxing, football requires a significant amount of equipment for each player.  At some point, it may no longer be economical for schools to offer football.  Or, stated otherwise, there may be eroding support for incurring the expense of football equipment.  Football cannot sustain its level of popularity if fewer and fewer people are participating at the scholastic level.

In the college landscape, football is the cash cow.  That cash cow depends on continued popularity.  The football money is the reason why there has been realignment discussion daily for the past several years.  It is also the reason why the Big East–with lagging football prowess–runs the risk of extinction.  While basketball can pay for itself, football is so popular and profitable that it pays for all other sports.  In fact, the revenue has gotten so enormous that it is justifying colleges shifting their allegiance from one region to another.

But what if football ceases to be as popular as it is now?  Will all of this realignment have been for naught?  Perhaps this is the reason that schools like Florida State are not so eager to run off to the Big XII.  While football money is nice, a college exists to provide an education.  Abandoning regional comraderie for a few extra football dollars may be shortsighted, especially if football’s popularity is peaking.  At the very least, the aftermath will be a lot of strange bedfellows.  One can only wonder what happens if and when the “buzz” of football money gives way to the hangover of football retreating in popularity.  Those profiting from college football should be keeping a sharp eye on the health of the players.  If the perception of football changes, the profitability of football will not be far behind.

Proposed ACC Divisions

With the recent addition of Louisville to replace Maryland, the word is that Louisville will just slot into Maryland’s position in the divisions.  What are those divisions?  Who knows?  The non-geographical distribution makes them impossible to remember.  In any event, the Confidential recommends the following divisions:

Atlantic (Coastal rival)

Boston College (NC State)

Wake Forest (Duke)

Syracuse (North Carolina)

Virginia Tech (Virginia)

Louisville (Clemson)

Pittsburgh (Georgia Tech)

Miami (Florida State)

In other words, this would be geographical, except that Wake Forest and Miami slide north and Virginia stays with the South.

The real loser here is Wake Forest, who loses games with its North Carolina-based rivals.  But this is just reality here–Wake Forest is in the worst negotiating position of all teams in the NCAA.  Even Iowa State has its own network now.  You can make arguments for every ACC school to be in some other conference.  But not Wake Forest.  So, with apologies to the Demon Deacons, they just need to suck it up.  Life isn’t fair.  Besides, they also get to be in a division with two private schools.

Virginia gets to be in the South, playing North Carolina and Virginia Tech every year.

Miami gets to play Syracuse and Boston College–Northern exposure every year for those schools.  Florida State gets to be with all Southern-based schools.  Rare trips up north.  Miami and Florida State will play every year.

Were UConn and Cincinnati to ever join… this could be tweaked as follows:

Atlantic (Coastal rival)

Boston College (Wake Forest)

Cincinnati (NC State)

Syracuse (Duke)

UConn (North Carolina)

Virginia Tech (Virginia)

Louisville (Clemson)

Pittsburgh (Georgia Tech)

Miami (Florida State)

Under this scenario, private schools are matched up again.  The basketball is slanted heavily towards the Atlantic.  But any division with Duke and North Carolina is always going to be tough.

In the Confidential’s view, doing whatever one it can to make the divisions logical and easy to remember behooves its short-term and long-term interests.  No matter how hard you try to make divisions competitively balanced, it will not work out perfectly.  So at least use logic and common sense.

What do you think?  Do you prefer the current set-up?  Different idea?

Nice Article About ACC’s Financial Picture

The Confidential will be light for the next week or so.  Sorry in advance.  There will not be many posts.

Here is a link to check out though.  The ACC might not be able to compete with the Big 10, but it sure is looking good overall.  According to this article, anyway.   Give it a read and let us know what you think.

R.I.P. Big East

Well, the Confidential is all about the Atlantic Coast Conference.  That being said, there is no denying that the ACC has had a huge role in killing the Big East, taking Miami, Virginia Tech, Boston College, Syracuse, Pitt, Louisville, and Notre Dame in the past 10 years or so.  That’s a conference unto itself.  Thus, today’s news that the Big East will announce the exiting of more schools–the seven basketball-oriented, football-eschewing, Catholic schools–is met with some guilt.  That the Big East is dying is unfortunate.  Moving forward, however, the question is what happens next?

The general consensus is that the 7 Catholic schools will somehow, someway form a new conference.  It might be called the Big East.  It might be called something else.  Who knows?  The consensus also is that additional, similar schools will be invited.  If so, this is what the Confidential would like to see:

Catholic Basketball Conference–East: Providence, Seton Hall, St. John’s, Georgetown, Villanova, Fordham

Catholic Basketball Conference–West: DePaul, Marquette, Creighton, St. Louis, Dayton, Xavier

If they wanted to get crazy, they could great a western flank, with Gonzaga, Loyolla Marymount, Santa Clara, and Portland, among others.  Either way, this would be the Catholic Basketball Conference–why not?

What about football?  What about football.  Yikes.  These are dark times for UConn, Cincinnati, USF, and Temple.  Newcomers UCF, SMU, Houston, Memphis, East Carolina, Tulane, and Navy are not too thrilled either.  While some of those schools may eventually get promoted to a top 5 conference, they cannot worry about that right now.

Without making a prediction, this is what the Confidential would like to see is two larger conferences form, centered around geography.  They can use the C-USA and MWC labels, as necessary.  It is important for the talent to be consolidated into two conferences so that there are more, better games.  This is the only way those schools will ever show any separation.  Remember, Boise State played a rather unimpressive schedule en route to national prominence.  It is up to these schools to schedule strong OOC and follow the same pattern.  If a small school in Boise, Idaho, can do it, any school can.

 

 

Post Navigation